Energy Tax Aspects of Chicago's $7.2 Billion Building Program
IntroductionChicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel has announced a major 7.2 billion dollar infrastructure improvement and municipal building energy reduction initiative. As a recent Obama Administration executive branch officer, Mayor Emanuel is a young energetic individual with a recognized bias for action. His federal government experience provides him with an insider track to the policies and goals of the administration in the area of energy efficiency and more importantly the direct connections with federal government administrators in charge of energy related initiatives.
Code Sec. 179D Tax OpportunitiesPursuant to Energy Policy Act (EPAct) Code Sec. 179D, as enacted by EPAct, property owners of commercial buildings and the primary designer on government projects in Illinois making qualifying energy-reducing investments in their new or existing locations can obtain immediate tax deductions of up to $1.80 per square foot.
If the building project does not qualify for the maximum $1.80-per-square-foot immediate tax deduction, there are tax deductions of up to $0.60 per square foot for each of the three major building subsystems: lighting, HVAC (heating, ventilating, and air conditioning) and the building envelope. The building envelope is every item on the building's exterior perimeter that touches the outside world including roof, walls, insulation, doors, windows and foundation.
Overview of the InitiativeThe City of Chicago, under the leadership of Mayor Rahm Emanuel, is commencing a project to retrofit their buildings and infrastructure through the creation of the Chicago Initiative Trust. This allows the city to raise both public and private capital funding of about $1.7 billion without dipping into tax revenue. The entire project, called “Building a New Chicago,” weighs in at about $7.2 billion and attempts to fix a large portion of Chicago's aging infrastructure, ranging from sewers to roads to airports. More specifically, more than 100 Chicago Transit Authority stations, Chicago's rail system, will be repaired; $1.1 billion will be spent on the infrastructure educational improvements; $1.4 billion will be spent improving Chicago's O'Hare International Airport. Airports are of particular interest due to their ability to create a local economy around the airport itself. In addition, $250 million has been already allocated to “Retrofit Chicago,” with the goal of transforming the Chicago owned buildings into energy efficient models for other municipalities in the United States to follow.
Additive Project FundingThis Chicago initiative is a public-private partnership where the funding for this massive project will be additive including:
1) The Energy Cost Savings
Energy costs saved from today's generation of energy efficient products is substantial. Energy efficiency lighting can reduce electric costs by 50% or more, and energy efficient HVAC can reduce costs by 20% or more.
2) Local Utility Rebates – Utility companies, including ComEd, Nicor, and DSIRE, typically offer rebates for energy efficient lighting and all HVAC. See footnote for rebate details.
3) The Clinton Initiative – As part of a goal for climate change, former President Bill Clinton has established the Clinton Climate Initiative where financing can be achieved for retrofit projects such as the one in Chicago. President Clinton has supported the Chicago Infrastructure Trust and even announced a retrofit project with Mayor Emanuel. This united announcement illustrates the ability of Mayor Emanuel to get connected with high powered individuals in the federal government.
4) Private Sources which will presumably include ESCO Provided Energy Performance Contracting and On-Bill Utility Financing
ESCO is short for Energy Service Company. ESCOs are the companies who provide the energy equipment installation services. In this case, the contracted ESCO will finance the project themselves. Then, the ESCO is paid back through future cost savings, which means the building owner or primary designer does not have to worry about the potential cost savings. The ESCO usually requires a contract of up to ten years to guarantee a return on investment.
On-Bill Financing allows the city of Chicago to finance the initiative by paying off the principle and interest of the investment through their monthly utility bill. Due to the cost savings of the improvements, the utility bill should decrease making ongoing payments less, while paying off the cost of the initiative at the same time.
5) The $1.7 Billion of public and private capital funding described above
Jump Starting the Chicago EconomyChicago, America's third largest city, has been challenged by mediocre economic results, while New York City, the largest city in the United States, has benefited from a resilient economy and Houston from a faster growing economy. Among major metropolitan areas in the world, Chicago has the fourth largest economy in the world ranking behind Tokyo, New York, and Los Angeles. This initiative project creates jobs, which should spur the economy, while the Chicago infrastructure gets improved along the way.
Remaining a Competitive CityTo remain a competitive member of the big four cities Chicago must reduce its municipal building energy costs. New York City has mandatory energy benchmarking for buildings sized 50,000 square feet or greater. See the table below for a detailed comparison between Chicago and New York. Los Angeles has a more rigorous building energy code too, and also uses mandatory energy usage benchmarking. Houston has embarked on a major initiative to reduce municipal building energy use including energy efficient lighting, HVAC, and building envelope as part of what it calls ReBuild Houston.
Major building renovation is a labor intensive activity requiring architects, engineers, project managers, other consultants, electricians, HVAC contractors, carpenters, and other construction laborers. This job creating initiative will stimulate the local economy.